No 👣 tracking social sharing

Science vs. Creation Science

Visual Evolution
was formerly www.visual-evolution.com

All images are copyrighted as noted. All other images are believed to be in the public domain. Please advise if you believe otherwise. Content copyright 2001-2004 Visual Evolution. Keep it real.


Frequently asked questions...


Q. How does mainstream science differ from creation science?


"Science is a process of searching for fundamental and universal principles that govern causes and effects in the universe. The process itself is a method of building, testing, and connecting falsifiable models to describe, explain and predict a shared reality. The method includes hypothesis, repeatable experiments and observations, and new hypothesis. The prime criterion in determining the usefulness of a model is the ease with which the model correctly makes predictions or explains phenomena in the shared reality." From Young Skeptics website.


Contrast this to the stated goals of ICR: "All things in the universe were created and made by God in the six literal days of the creation week described in Genesis 1:1-2:3, and confirmed in Exodus 20:8-11. The creation record is factual, historical, and perspicuous; thus all theories of origins or development which involve evolution in any form are false. All things which now exist are sustained and ordered by God's providential care. However, a part of the spiritual creation, Satan and his angels, rebelled against God after the creation and are attempting to thwart His divine purposes in creation."
Source: www.icr.org/abouticr/tenets.htm


So... the end result of any "creation" research must support their unchalangable assumption. This is not science, this is religion. (By the way, if Satan is "attempting to thwart His divine purposes" apparently their god is not all powerful. What does this imply for christian monotheism?)

Friends and Colleagues